Importance of Federal Equipment Programs

//Importance of Federal Equipment Programs

Importance of Federal Equipment Programs

2016-06-14T16:07:01+00:00 June 14th, 2016|From the Grand Lodge|Comments Off on Importance of Federal Equipment Programs
Importance of Federal equipment programs

Download PDF of Letter

Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police, penned a letter to the US Senate Majority and Minority Leaders to declare support for efforts to restore the equipment programs for local law enforcement.

 

Text of letter

Dear Senators McConnell and Reid,

I am writing on behalf of the members of the Fraternal Order of Police to advise you of our strong support for efforts to include in S. 2943, the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017,” language which will restore the important equipment programs for State and local law enforcement and roll back the recently imposed limitations on the types of equipment that can be made available to law enforcement.

The FOP has long supported programs like the 1033 program, which is a surplus equipment program administered by the Defense Logistics Agencies (DLA) and the Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) at the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). In reaction to unfavorable news coverage of law enforcement response to large demonstrations, the Administration was suddenly concerned about our nation’s police becoming too “militarized.” In an effort to “de­ militarize” the police, the Administration and Members of Congress identified this long­ established program for elimination or reduction simply because it was administered by the DoD.

By Executive Order, the President established a Law Enforcement Equipment Working Group (LEEWG) and tasked it with improving all existing Federal programs which provide local, State, tribal and Federal law enforcement agencies (LEA) with equipment. The FOP believes that the recommendations, some of which went into immediate effect, do not improve on these programs and reduce the type of equipment available to law enforcement. For example, the .50 caliber round can no longer be procured by LEAs from any Federal equipment program. This is despite their use in stopping an attack on the Dallas Police Headquarters last summer by a gunman in an armored vehicle. The vehicle was disabled by officers firing .50 caliber rounds into the engine block.

More recently, in response to the terrorist attack in Orlando, law enforcement officers set off a controlled explosion to distract the shooter and used an armored vehicle to breach the walls of the nightclub. One of the responding officers was struck in the head, but his life was saved by his anti-ballistic helmet. These types of equipment were once readily available through Federal equipment programs but Executive Order 13688 has placed these explosives, breaching tools and even anti-ballistic helmets on a “controlled” equipment list. The end result is that this equipment is now much more difficult to obtain through Federal programs.

No one at the scene of this tragic event in Orlando was troubled by the appearance of the armored vehicle, the use of explosives to effect a hostage rescue or the appearance of the responding    officers wearing  helmets.   This equipment  saved lives.

The FOP also finds offensive the central premise which drove the LEEWG to identify what equipment  should be prohibited  and controlled  list:

However, given  the potential for  misapplication  of controlled  equipment listed above, LEAs must provide  expanded justification  for  its acquisition,  including a description  of how the equipment  would  be deployed,  the agency’s policies  and protocols  on deployment, and verification of training provided to LEAs on the appropriate use of such controlled  equipment.

Simply put, now standard equipment  like an anti-ballistic  helmet  is controlled  for fear that  a  chief, sheriff or other operational command officer may “misapply” its use.  The officer who is  alive today because  of his gear would  disagree.   The Justice Department  has not produced  any data nor conducted any studies to support its theory that State and local law enforcement agencies  are misusing equipment obtained through Federal grant programs. The heroic response of law enforcement to the terrorist  attack on the Pulse nightclub  demonstrated  the utility  and  necessity of the equipment our officers need. It is imperative that S. 2943 incorporate a provision to reverse Executive Order 13688 by including language like that found in H.R. 4880/S. 2694, the “Protecting Lives Using Surplus (PLUS) Equipment Act.”

The FOP knows that programs like the 1033 program are very valuable to State and local law enforcement and we saw that equipment in action in Orlando this weekend. On behalf of the more than 330,000 members of the Fraternal Order of Police, we implore you to take immediate action on this issue. If I can provide any additional information on this issue, please feel free to contact me or Executive Director Jim Pasco in my Washington office.

 

Chuck Canterbury
National President

Follow me

John Blackmon

A retired law enforcement officer who now serves as the President of the Fraternal Order of Police Tri-County Lodge #3.
Follow me

Latest posts by John Blackmon (see all)